FLETC Legal Practice Exam 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

In analyzing the outcome of Wooster's motion to suppress the credit cards found during the frisk, the correct rationale is based on the legality of the frisk itself. A "frisk" is a limited search conducted by law enforcement to ensure that a suspect is not carrying a weapon, based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. If the frisk extends beyond its lawful purpose, any evidence found as a result may be deemed inadmissible in court.

In this context, if Wooster's motion to suppress the credit cards was granted due to the alleged illegality of the frisk, it suggests that the agents did not have justification under the law to conduct the search that led to the discovery of the credit cards. The implication is that the agents exceeded the scope of the frisk, which is intended solely for weapons. Consequently, any items found that are not weapons, without proper justification, infringe upon Wooster’s rights and would be deemed inadmissible.

This context highlights the importance of adhering to established legal standards concerning searches and seizures. A frisk should not result in the seizure of items unless the officer has probable cause to believe they are weapons or if the items are immediately identifiable as contraband under the applicable legal standards. This understanding frames the outcome of the motion